{"id":5845,"date":"2017-09-01T09:00:59","date_gmt":"2017-09-01T09:00:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/fondazionecomel.org\/2017\/09\/01\/approfondimento-bodies-balance-santorios-legacy-baglivis-physiopathology\/"},"modified":"2017-09-01T09:00:59","modified_gmt":"2017-09-01T09:00:59","slug":"approfondimento-bodies-balance-santorios-legacy-baglivis-physiopathology","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fondazionecomel.org\/en\/dialogando-en\/newsletter-en\/approfondimento-en\/approfondimento-bodies-balance-santorios-legacy-baglivis-physiopathology\/","title":{"rendered":"APPROFONDIMENTO: Bodies in balance. Santorio\u2019s legacy in Baglivi\u2019s physiopathology"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Introduction<\/strong><br \/>\nIn 1704, the Croatian physician Giorgio Baglivi (1668-1707), one of the leading representatives of Iatromechanics in Italy, published the <em>Canones de medicina solidorum<\/em>, a commentary to Santorio\u2019s <em>De Statica medicina<\/em>. According to the preface to Giovanni Francesco Mauroceno, Baglivi used to recommend Santorio\u2019s work to his students during his lectures at Archiginnasio in Rome. Since this text was out of print and therefore difficult to find, a Roman bookseller invited Baglivi to write some additional annotations to be added in a future reprint of that work. After some hesitation, Baglivi agreed and completed his commentary in only a few days.<\/p>\n<p>We must recognise that this short commentary by Baglivi, consisting of 51 aphorisms (or \u201ccanons\u201d), followed by nine additional \u201cmedical rules,\u201d does not add anything new to what has been already claimed in his previous works. Baglivi\u2019s analysis of Santorio\u2019s <em>De statica medicina<\/em> is entirely placed in the more general framework of his fibrillary theory, which is provided in <em>De fibra motrice et morbosa<\/em> (1702). However, this work contributed to the spread of Santorio\u2019s thought in eighteenth-century medicine.<\/p>\n<p>My paper at Santorio International Conference was mainly concerned with these two issues: what role did Santorio\u2019s <em>De statica medicina<\/em> play in Baglivi\u2019s medicine? And how did Baglivi adapt that work to both the new challenges of medical practice and the new discoveries of modern anatomy and physiology? I believe that the answer should be found in the concept of \u201cbalance\u201d: Baglivi turns the idea of humoral eukrasia into a \u201cdynamic equilibrium of forces\u201d interacting between solids and fluids of the body.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>1. Baglivi\u2019s physiopathology and the concept of balance<br \/>\n<\/strong><br \/>\nThe key to understand Baglivi\u2019s operation lies in can. 31:<\/p>\n<p><em>Qui Staticen Solidorum oscillantium, &amp; Liquidorum currentium, vel traditam ab aliis, vel a nobis in libris de Medicina Solidorum, sive de Fibra Motrice, &amp; Morbosa explicatam possidet ipsam Sanctorii Staticen, atque clavem plurium difficilium morborum naturam reserandi, tollendique possidet.<br \/>\n<\/em><\/p>\n<p>So, only those who know the \u201cstatics,\u201d i.e. the balance between solids and liquids in the body, holds the same statics of Santorio and can properly treat diseases. But how?\u00a0Baglivi believes that his fibrillary theory is the most plausible hypothesis to understand Santorio\u2019s statics and exploit its potential in medicine: alternative hypotheses, as that of cardimelech, archeus, or acids-alkalis distinction are definitely untenable:<\/p>\n<p><em>\u00c6quilibrium solidorum, &amp; liquidorum, divisio fibrarum in systema carnearum, &amp; membranearum; vis, origo, effectus, oscillatio, &amp; Mechanice solidorum corporis animati; [\u2026] ad assequendam Sanctorii Staticen, &amp; reconditas morborum indicationes eruendas pr\u00e6 aliis hypothesibus utiliores, clarioresque videntur<\/em> (can. 41).<\/p>\n<p>Therefore, we need to briefly explore the main features of his fibrillary theory.<\/p>\n<p>Baglivi distinguishes between two types of fibres, membraneous and motor\/muscular, which not only differ in origin, structure, and function, but belong also to two different but strictly interrelated systems, directed respectively by the dura mater and the heart.<\/p>\n<p>In the first system, the dura mater supervises all vessels, glands, and viscera as a result of its physical and material proximity with them, that is with all the parts of the body that share its same membraneous substance. This implies that the movement of the dura mater is transmitted to all the other parts of its system by means of pure contact. This applies also to the second system, in which the heart, through the blood circulation, directs muscles, tendons and bones, which consist of muscular (and not membraneous) fibres.<\/p>\n<p>However, although there seems to be a mutual correspondence between the two systems, the system of the dura mater, reaching every part of the body by means of its membranes \u2014 even muscles \u2014 exercises control and transmits its motion over the entire body, heart too. A problem of balancing solids and fluids is thus clearly at stake here.<\/p>\n<p>Every affection on the dura mater immediately affects what happens in the heart and, consequently, in its fluids. The <em>dura mater<\/em> is, moreover, inevitably stronger than the heart. Heart accomplishes blood circulation thanks to a series of physical aids, as the pressure exerted by the air in the lungs, the vessels\u2019 structure and diameter, the action of valves, the muscles\u2019 contraction, and so on, that all oppose and reduce the resistance of solids. Conversely, the <em>dura mater<\/em> is able, at the same time, to contract a solid (and not a fluid) like the brain and to diffuse the nervous fluid throughout the body, without any support. Restoring the balance between solids and fluids is therefore not a trivial task because it involves this complex relationship between the meninges of the brain and the heart.<\/p>\n<p>At the very beginning of the chapter 6 of <em>De Fibra<\/em>, Baglivi gives a tentatively definition of balance:<\/p>\n<p><em>Nec a nobis in hac materia \u00e6quilibrium juxta ejus strictiores leges, utque a Mechanicis; atque Hydraulicis sumitur, accipietur; At \u00e6quilibrium dicemus proportionem quamdam inter motum dur\u00e6 matris, &amp; motum cordis, inter motum oscillationis villorum, seu solidorum membranosorum unius partis cum solidis membranosis alterius; inter motum successivum; sive oscillatorium villorum membranosorum cum motu villorum carnosorum; Inter fibras perpetuo se contrahentes; &amp; inter fluida ad contactum fibrarum currentia; Denique inter fluida, &amp; fluida tum homogenea, tum etherogenea per diversos canals, variisque motus inclinationibus decurrentia<\/em> [\u2026].<\/p>\n<p>Thus, balance is not the exact equilibrium of mechanics or hydraulics, but a \u201cproportion\u201d of sorts between solids and solids, fluids and fluids, solids and fluids, which can be derived only from direct observations and bedside experiences.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>2. Some clinical implications<br \/>\n<\/strong><br \/>\nWe can try to draw some clinical implications. Baglivi and Santorio seem to observe and examine the same phenomena but at different levels and in different ways. Santorio\u2019s annotations on some crucial bodily processes such as digestion, evacuation, perspiration and so on are correct and still valid because all suppose and involve the mechanism of balance between solids and fluids identified by Baglivi.<\/p>\n<p>So, Baglivi tries to \u201ctranslate\u201d Santorio\u2019s statics into his physiopathology, as for example in can. 38, about concoction: \u201cCoctio humorum in laxitate debita solidorum, &amp; liquidorum consistit; cruditas vero in contractione, ac veluti confusione strangulationeque eorumdem.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>But Baglivi\u2019s attention on the balance between solids and fluid can be useful also in experimentation. In can. 28, for example, Baglivi states that it is difficult to understand the action of drugs without considering the relationship between solids and fluids in the body:<\/p>\n<p>Perspectam habere velle mechanicen<em>, qua <\/em>agunt medicamenta<em> in <\/em>curatione morborum<em>, <\/em>difficile<em> est; nisi <\/em>habeatur notitia<em> Statices Solidorum, &amp; Liquidorum, <\/em>cognitioque<em> \u00e6quilibrii, <\/em>virium<em>, &amp; <\/em>resistentiarum<em> inter <\/em>ipsa [\u2026].<\/p>\n<p>This is the reason why Baglivi prefers testing drugs in vivo by means of infusory surgery that, without being limited by the physical constraints of anatomical dissections, can act directly and simultaneously on both solids and fluids.<\/p>\n<p>This is the case, for example, of the much-debated problem of the action of vesicants. Contrary to what was claimed by Van Helmont, Baglivi argues that vesicants may be useful, under certain conditions. In <em>De usu et abusu vescicantium<\/em> he aims at accurately distinguishing the cases in which such an application is permitted and the cases in which it is not, by infusing Cantharides tincture in dogs.<\/p>\n<p>Experiments show that the action of the drug infused may be reduced because of the length of the blood vessel and hence the distance from the heart but also the resistance of both the blood and the vascular system (for example, vessel wall). Thus, the drugs\u2019 effects depend on solid-fluid relationship.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Conclusions<\/strong><br \/>\nThis short overview firstly shows how Baglivi was influenced by Santorio. <em>De <\/em>statica medicina serves as a bridge joining two apparently different and opposite fields of research in Baglivi\u2019s medicine: on one hand, the reform of medical practice against the spread of \u201csystems\u201d in medicine, described in <em>De <\/em>praxi medica (1696), and on the other the foundation of a fibrillary \u201csystem\u201d through which physicians can interpret normal and diseased conditions. In other words, Santorio\u2019s statics enables Baglivi to show how a \u201csystem,\u201d if correctly informed by what really happens in nature through observations and experiments in vivo, can be useful and plausible in medicine.<\/p>\n<p>However, at the same time, Baglivi tries to provide also a somehow updated version of Santorio\u2019s work, in order to make it compatible with the new discoveries of modern physiology, such as blood circulation, that Santorio inevitably ignored.<\/p>\n<p>Therefore, Baglivi\u2019s <em>Canones<\/em> offers a valuable means to investigate the transmission of Santorio\u2019s <em>De <\/em>statica medicina during the eighteenth century.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Luca Tonetti<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Sapienza University of RomeSantorio Fellow, May 2017<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>References<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Baglivi G. 1704, <em>Opera omnia medico-practica, et anatomica, <\/em>sumptibus Anisson, &amp; Joannis Posuel, Lugduni.<\/p>\n<p>Baglivi G. 1707, <em>Canones de medicina solidorum ad rectum statices usum. Cum additamentis<\/em>, apud Fredericum Harring, Lugduni Batavorum.<\/p>\n<p>Baglivi G. 1710, <em>Opera omnia medico-practica, et anatomica<\/em>. Editio Septima, sumptibus Anisson, et Joannis Posuel, Lugduni.<\/p>\n<p>Tonetti L. 2016, <em>Corpus fasciculus fibrarum: Teoria della fibra e pratica medica nel De praxi medica di Giorgio Baglivi<\/em>, in \u00abPhysis. Rivista Internazionale di Storia della Scienza\u00bb, 51(Nuova serie 1-2), pp. 379-392.<\/p>\n<p>Tonetti L. 2017, <em>Machines and Diseases: Giorgio Baglivi and his Mechanistic Physiopathology, in Wired Bodies. New Perspectives on the Machine-Organism Analogy<\/em>, ed. by N.D. Cilia, L. Tonetti, CNR Edizioni, Rome, pp. 37-44.<\/p>\n<p>Vidal M. 1990, <em>Giorgio Baglivi tra osservazione clinica e speculazioni iatromeccaniche<\/em>, in \u00abAtti del centro ricerche storiche di Rovigno\u00bb, 20, pp. 133-214.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Introduction In 1704, the Croatian physician Giorgio Baglivi (1668-1707), one of the leading representatives of Iatromechanics in Italy, published the Canones de medicina solidorum, a commentary to Santorio\u2019s De Statica medicina. According to the preface to Giovanni Francesco Mauroceno, Baglivi used to recommend Santorio\u2019s work to his students during his lectures at Archiginnasio in Rome. Since this text was out of print and therefore difficult to find, a Roman bookseller invited Baglivi to write some additional annotations to be added in a future reprint of that work. After some hesitation, Baglivi agreed and completed his commentary in only a few [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":21,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[804,805,838],"tags":[],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v17.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>APPROFONDIMENTO: Bodies in balance. Santorio\u2019s legacy in Baglivi\u2019s physiopathology - Fondazione Comel<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/fondazionecomel.org\/en\/dialogando-en\/newsletter-en\/approfondimento-en\/approfondimento-bodies-balance-santorios-legacy-baglivis-physiopathology\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"APPROFONDIMENTO: Bodies in balance. Santorio\u2019s legacy in Baglivi\u2019s physiopathology - Fondazione Comel\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Introduction In 1704, the Croatian physician Giorgio Baglivi (1668-1707), one of the leading representatives of Iatromechanics in Italy, published the Canones de medicina solidorum, a commentary to Santorio\u2019s De Statica medicina. According to the preface to Giovanni Francesco Mauroceno, Baglivi used to recommend Santorio\u2019s work to his students during his lectures at Archiginnasio in Rome. Since this text was out of print and therefore difficult to find, a Roman bookseller invited Baglivi to write some additional annotations to be added in a future reprint of that work. After some hesitation, Baglivi agreed and completed his commentary in only a few [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/fondazionecomel.org\/en\/dialogando-en\/newsletter-en\/approfondimento-en\/approfondimento-bodies-balance-santorios-legacy-baglivis-physiopathology\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Fondazione Comel\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-09-01T09:00:59+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Luca Tonetti\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fondazionecomel.org\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/fondazionecomel.org\/\",\"name\":\"Fondazione Comel\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/fondazionecomel.org\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fondazionecomel.org\/en\/dialogando-en\/newsletter-en\/approfondimento-en\/approfondimento-bodies-balance-santorios-legacy-baglivis-physiopathology\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/fondazionecomel.org\/en\/dialogando-en\/newsletter-en\/approfondimento-en\/approfondimento-bodies-balance-santorios-legacy-baglivis-physiopathology\/\",\"name\":\"APPROFONDIMENTO: Bodies in balance. Santorio\\u2019s legacy in Baglivi\\u2019s physiopathology - Fondazione Comel\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fondazionecomel.org\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2017-09-01T09:00:59+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-09-01T09:00:59+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fondazionecomel.org\/#\/schema\/person\/40647a6bef106926f53d9b6754fbe11f\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fondazionecomel.org\/en\/dialogando-en\/newsletter-en\/approfondimento-en\/approfondimento-bodies-balance-santorios-legacy-baglivis-physiopathology\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/fondazionecomel.org\/en\/dialogando-en\/newsletter-en\/approfondimento-en\/approfondimento-bodies-balance-santorios-legacy-baglivis-physiopathology\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fondazionecomel.org\/en\/dialogando-en\/newsletter-en\/approfondimento-en\/approfondimento-bodies-balance-santorios-legacy-baglivis-physiopathology\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/fondazionecomel.org\/en\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"APPROFONDIMENTO: Bodies in balance. Santorio\\u2019s legacy in Baglivi\\u2019s physiopathology\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fondazionecomel.org\/#\/schema\/person\/40647a6bef106926f53d9b6754fbe11f\",\"name\":\"Luca Tonetti\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fondazionecomel.org\/#personlogo\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a40507015bfc7d6205eb4579860999d6?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a40507015bfc7d6205eb4579860999d6?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Luca Tonetti\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/fondazionecomel.org\/en\/author\/luca-tonetti\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"APPROFONDIMENTO: Bodies in balance. Santorio\u2019s legacy in Baglivi\u2019s physiopathology - Fondazione Comel","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/fondazionecomel.org\/en\/dialogando-en\/newsletter-en\/approfondimento-en\/approfondimento-bodies-balance-santorios-legacy-baglivis-physiopathology\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"APPROFONDIMENTO: Bodies in balance. Santorio\u2019s legacy in Baglivi\u2019s physiopathology - Fondazione Comel","og_description":"Introduction In 1704, the Croatian physician Giorgio Baglivi (1668-1707), one of the leading representatives of Iatromechanics in Italy, published the Canones de medicina solidorum, a commentary to Santorio\u2019s De Statica medicina. According to the preface to Giovanni Francesco Mauroceno, Baglivi used to recommend Santorio\u2019s work to his students during his lectures at Archiginnasio in Rome. Since this text was out of print and therefore difficult to find, a Roman bookseller invited Baglivi to write some additional annotations to be added in a future reprint of that work. After some hesitation, Baglivi agreed and completed his commentary in only a few [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/fondazionecomel.org\/en\/dialogando-en\/newsletter-en\/approfondimento-en\/approfondimento-bodies-balance-santorios-legacy-baglivis-physiopathology\/","og_site_name":"Fondazione Comel","article_published_time":"2017-09-01T09:00:59+00:00","twitter_card":"summary","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Luca Tonetti","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/fondazionecomel.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/fondazionecomel.org\/","name":"Fondazione Comel","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/fondazionecomel.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/fondazionecomel.org\/en\/dialogando-en\/newsletter-en\/approfondimento-en\/approfondimento-bodies-balance-santorios-legacy-baglivis-physiopathology\/#webpage","url":"https:\/\/fondazionecomel.org\/en\/dialogando-en\/newsletter-en\/approfondimento-en\/approfondimento-bodies-balance-santorios-legacy-baglivis-physiopathology\/","name":"APPROFONDIMENTO: Bodies in balance. Santorio\u2019s legacy in Baglivi\u2019s physiopathology - Fondazione Comel","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/fondazionecomel.org\/#website"},"datePublished":"2017-09-01T09:00:59+00:00","dateModified":"2017-09-01T09:00:59+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/fondazionecomel.org\/#\/schema\/person\/40647a6bef106926f53d9b6754fbe11f"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/fondazionecomel.org\/en\/dialogando-en\/newsletter-en\/approfondimento-en\/approfondimento-bodies-balance-santorios-legacy-baglivis-physiopathology\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/fondazionecomel.org\/en\/dialogando-en\/newsletter-en\/approfondimento-en\/approfondimento-bodies-balance-santorios-legacy-baglivis-physiopathology\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/fondazionecomel.org\/en\/dialogando-en\/newsletter-en\/approfondimento-en\/approfondimento-bodies-balance-santorios-legacy-baglivis-physiopathology\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/fondazionecomel.org\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"APPROFONDIMENTO: Bodies in balance. Santorio\u2019s legacy in Baglivi\u2019s physiopathology"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/fondazionecomel.org\/#\/schema\/person\/40647a6bef106926f53d9b6754fbe11f","name":"Luca Tonetti","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/fondazionecomel.org\/#personlogo","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a40507015bfc7d6205eb4579860999d6?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a40507015bfc7d6205eb4579860999d6?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Luca Tonetti"},"url":"https:\/\/fondazionecomel.org\/en\/author\/luca-tonetti\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fondazionecomel.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5845"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fondazionecomel.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fondazionecomel.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fondazionecomel.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/21"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fondazionecomel.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5845"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/fondazionecomel.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5845\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fondazionecomel.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5845"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fondazionecomel.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5845"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fondazionecomel.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5845"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}